What is missed about MLK

People always talk about how Martin Luther King Jr. had a non-violent approach to civil rights and this is what won the civil rights debate in the 1960's. If you look at what was going on then, you will realize that there were a ton of people working on civil rights. Most of them white, outspoken communists who saw the civil rights debate as a reason to topple governments. These folks were all violent while MLK Jr. was a soft spoken man who disobeyed but never went beyond. The black nationalists were walking around LA carrying guns and taking over the streets.

The black nationalists won, not King. Look at today's political environment, it it God fearing peaceful men like King that are in power or is it power hungry black nationalists and white communists who are running the country? It is the latter of course. King got the credit and died while those who did the work and took over the streets, scaring the white people into submitting -- THEY WON. King died.

The black nationalists are in the white house with their white Communists friends. We can lay down and play dead - ending up this way as King did. On the other hand, we can fight back and let others die for our cause while scaring people back into their place. I refuse to be a white slave to some oligarchy. This is not Africa with an unwieldy dictator in office - Someone just needs to tell this to the dictator in office.